Thursday, November 14, 2019
Former Netflix Chief Talent Officer Patty McCord on how to fix your company
Former Netflix Chief Talent Officer Patty McCord on how to fix your company Former Netflix Chief Talent Officer Patty McCord on how to fix your company Corporate America is known for specific kinds of standards, practices, and initiatives, but one person has thrown how organizations commonly operate today under the microscope.Along with CEO Reed Hastings, former Chief Talent Officer Patty McCord helped develop the Netflix Culture Deck - a manifesto which helped define the culture and values of the company - which made waves through Silicon Valley. âIt may well be the most important document ever to come out of the Valley,â Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg reportedly told GQ in an interview.The original presentation racked up more than 17 million views since it was first published in 2009, and was updated in June 2017.On the heels of the release of her new book, POWERFUL: Building a Culture of Freedom and Responsibility, McCord spoke with Ladders News about what she learned during her 14 years at Netflix.In the first of two parts, McCord discusses corporations and what they can do to evolve.On typical corporate standard s and conventions:âItâs not just that we call them âstandards,â ⦠we refer to them as âbest practicesâ in our organizations and what Iâm challenging is, âReally? Says who?â Looks a lot like weâre just copying each other to me.ââLetâs say I want a process that gives people feedback because I think itâll make them perform better. So we come up with the annual performance review and thatâs the best we could do? Really? Itâs not so much as I turn things on their head or recommend radically different stuff, mostly just that we just throw it away because it doesnât work anymore.âOn workplace feedback and annual performance reviews: âI learned a lot, Iâve been taking a lot of cues from professional sports coaches that Iâve been speaking with recently and if you talk to them about how they get performance from their teams ⦠thereâs a rhythm of giving feedback that is absolutely geared at optimal performance for every member of the team.âSo I donât really care what system you use, but I do know that you canât get very good at anything that you only do once a year. Iâm not wed to any particular rhythm but it needs to be more than once a year. It probably needs to be in the moment.ââThe most effective feedback is positive and in the moment. I mean catching people doing things right, encouraging them when youâve asked them to do something hard that theyâve actually tried and helped/succeeded at. Itâs that constant working together to make us a better team.âOn expectations of employees:âIf you expect excellence, you might get it even from mediocre performers. But if you expect mediocrity thatâs the best youâre gonna get.âOn one hand, weâre supposed to be the group that makes everybody happy, you know, the happiness police ⦠we want everyone to be engaged. And engaged, happy employees make better products, or so we say, we donât prove that, but we say that.âAnd on the other hand, weâve go tta protect the company from the evil employees that might sue us - so which one are they? And itâs not true that companies with lots of perks and happiness donât result in bad behavior, as weâve certainly seen lately.âOn âengagement,â âempowermentâ and âmillennialsâ: âIâve seen plenty of engaged employees at work, but theyâre not engaged because theyâre rewarded with perks and parties. Theyâre engaged because theyâre working on stuff thatâs interesting to them, with other smart people, that makes a difference. Thatâs what engagement really is.ââEmpowerment is not something you give people, you empower people by giving them a lot of context and holding them responsible for the decisions they make and the impact that they have. That would be way more helpful than any class on empowering people.ââIâve just never been a fan of putting people in those big buckets, anyway, because theyâre too simple. And not broad enough. I mean, the idea that millennials donât want to work hard is ridiculous.âOn how employees should be treated âlike adultsâ at work:âOne of the biggest things that slow companies down is ⦠people having to ask for permission or get approval to do something when they know itâs the right thing to do - when theyâre making a good judgment call and they understand.ââWhen we ask people to ask for permission for things they can logically figure out ⦠then we say, âWe canât trust you.â In doing those things, weâre like, âYou canât make the best decisions,â and thatâs pretty childish if you think about it.â⦠yet, how being an adult is not just about reaching a certain age:â[In America] you have to be 18 to work. You should be pretty far along on that maturity curve. What I mean by âmaturityâ and what I mean by âadultâ is not [age]. I know really mature 25-year-olds, and I know really immature 45-year-olds. So, by âadult,â I mean, taking responsibility, following through on your commitments, informing other people - you know, the things that grown-ups do.âOn how technology keeps changing, just as companies should too:âI think itâs important to understand how weâre different [than millenials], you know? We hold in our hands the same computational power as I used to have [on my desk]. The idea that we call it a phone and we take pictures, send email, do text - basically, itâs what used to be a laptop computer that I now hold in my hand. ⦠It changes the way we all live and work, and I donât think technology tethers us to our jobs, I think it frees us.ââThatâs kind of the point of why I wrote the whole book: I thought, âYou know, really, weâre all doing things the same way we did in 1980?â Every couple of decades, we [really should] rethink this stuff.âOn how older companies can begin to peel away at the status quo:âI think that one of the think one of the things that larger, more established companies, do is a matter of habit. Everything has to be a huge corporate initiative. They strive for consistency in these big rollouts. And I think what they can at least try is: Take a little corner of the company, or a particular organization, and strip away some of the stuff from them, and see if it yields better performance. I think weâve learned now, that not everything has to be done the same way across the world with 100,000 employees.âOn the biggest fallacy regarding company management:â[The misconception] that managers have all the power. That theyâre psychic, and theyâre gonna make the right decisions for you, and they own your future. They donât. We gotta stop telling ourselves that lie because it hasnât been true for a really long time and itâs not true now, and itâs definitely not gonna be true in the future. This is a journey, you gotta embrace it, enjoy it.â
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.